Blog

The client is taught not to struggle against the wave or give in to it, thereby being “swept away” or “drowned” by the sensation, but to imagine “riding the wave” on a surf board. Like the conceptualization of urges and cravings as the result of an external stimulus, this imagery fosters detachment from the urges and cravings and reinforces the temporary and external nature of these phenomena. In a subsequent meta-analysis by Irwin, twenty-six published and unpublished studies representing a sample of 9,504 abstinence violation effect participants were included. Specifically, RP was most effective when applied to alcohol or polysubstance use disorders, combined with the adjunctive use of medication, and when evaluated immediately following treatment. Moderation analyses suggested that RP was consistently efficacious across treatment modalities (individual vs. group) and settings (inpatient vs. outpatient)22. Using a wave metaphor, urge surfing is an imagery technique to help clients gain control over impulses to use drugs or alcohol.

Together, this suggests a promising degree of alignment between goal selection and probability of success, and it highlights the potential utility of nonabstinence treatment as an “early intervention” approach to prevent SUD escalation. Relapse, or the return to heavy alcohol use following a period of abstinence or moderate use, occurs in many drinkers who have undergone alcoholism treatment. Traditional alcoholism treatment approaches often conceptualize relapse as an end-state, a negative outcome equivalent to treatment failure. Thus, this perspective considers only a dichotomous treatment outcome—that is, a person is either abstinent or relapsed. In contrast, several models of relapse that are based on social-cognitive or behavioral theories emphasize relapse as a transitional process, a series of events that unfold over time (Annis 1986; Litman et al. 1979; Marlatt and Gordon 1985).

What Is The Abstinence Violation Effect (AVE)?

As an HR professional, Brie’s primary focus is on ensuring that our organization attracts and retains the most talented and qualified individuals to help us fulfill our mission of providing compassionate care to those struggling with addiction. With a deep understanding of the unique challenges faced by those working in the substance abuse field, Brie is committed to creating a positive and supportive work environment where employees feel valued, respected, and empowered to make a difference in the lives of others. One of the biggest problems with the AVE is that periods of abstinence from opioids increase a person’s risk of overdose and today’s heroin is often tainted with super-potent fentanyl analogs. Because of heightened overdose risk, treatment providers can offer naloxone and overdose prevention training to all clients, even those whose “drug of choice” does not include opioids. Rather than communicating pessimism about a client’s potential to recover, these overdose prevention measures acknowledge the existence of the AVE and communicate that safety is more important than maintaining perfect abstinence.

In another study examining the behavioral intervention arm of the COMBINE study [128], individuals who received a skills training module focused on coping with craving and urges had significantly better drinking outcomes via decreases in negative mood and craving that occurred after receiving the module. A key feature of the dynamic model is its emphasis on the complex interplay between tonic and phasic processes. As indicated in Figure ​Figure2,2, distal risks may influence relapse either directly or indirectly (via phasic processes). For instance, the return to substance use can have reciprocal effects on the same cognitive or affective factors (motivation, mood, self-efficacy) that contributed to the lapse. Lapses may also evoke physiological (e.g., alleviation of withdrawal) and/or cognitive (e.g., the AVE) responses that in turn determine whether use escalates or desists.

Challenge Negative Thoughts

While the overall number of studies examining neural correlates of relapse remains small at present, the coming years will undoubtedly see a significant escalation in the number of studies using fMRI to predict response to psychosocial and pharmacological treatments. In this context, a critical question will concern the predictive and clinical utility of brain-based measures with respect to predicting treatment outcome. In the last several years increasing emphasis has been placed on “dual process” models of addiction, which hypothesize that distinct (but related) cognitive networks, each reflective of specific neural pathways, act to influence substance use behavior.

These strategies also focus on enhancing the client’s awareness of cognitive, emotional, and behavioral reactions in order to prevent a lapse from escalating into a relapse. The first step in this process is to teach clients the RP model and to give them a “big picture” view of the relapse process. For example, the therapist can use the metaphor of behavior change as a journey that includes both easy and difficult stretches of highway and for which various “road signs” (e.g., “warning signals”) are available to provide guidance. According to this metaphor, learning to anticipate and plan for high-risk situations during recovery from alcoholism is equivalent to having a good road map, a well-equipped tool box, a full tank of gas, and a spare tire in good condition for the journey. Only a small minority of people with substance use disorders (SUDs) receive treatment.

Participants

Given data demonstrating a clear link between abstinence goals and treatment engagement in a primarily abstinence-based SUD treatment system, it is reasonable to hypothesize that offering nonabstinence treatment would increase overall engagement by appealing to those with nonabstinence goals. Indeed, there is anecdotal evidence that this may be the case; for example, a qualitative study of nonabstinence drug treatment in Denmark described a client saying that he would not have presented to abstinence-only treatment due to his goal of moderate use (Järvinen, 2017). Additionally, in the United Kingdom, where there is greater access to nonabstinence treatment (Rosenberg & Melville, 2005; Rosenberg & Phillips, 2003), the proportion of individuals with opioid use disorder engaged in treatment is more than twice that of the U.S. (60% vs. 28%; Burkinshaw et al., 2017).